Apple’s efforts on conflict free tantalum procurement

An article published by the Financial Times titled “Apple to name and shame suppliers of conflict minerals” (February 13, 2014) describes Apple’s “supplier responsibility” report. Given the Dodd-Frank bill’s requirement to track use of conflict materials, Apple plans to use the electronics industry companies that use around 50% of the tantalum mined, to drive supplier compliance. Rather than source from a couple of certified suppliers, the company claims that it wants to increase compliance in the smelter supply base by listing compliance certified suppliers. Given that the electronics industry is a much smaller user of gold, tungsten etc, do you expect the approach used for tantalum can be expanded to other minerals ? Will Apple’s reports generate spillover benefits for other competitors or will it increase Apple’s negotiating power by having more possible suppliers ? Will the need to track supply sources increase costs to the point that smaller smelters will be uncompetitive ?

Posted in Global Contexts, Operations Management, Supply Chain Issues | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Will delaying online cab service pickups by 15 minutes increase competition in France

An article in the Wall Street Journal titled “Uber, Taxis engage in French Street Fight” (30 December 2013) describes a proposal to impose a 15 minute delay between the online order and pickup by online by limo service companies like Uber in France. This delay doubles the usual time for pickup for such companies and is intended to help taxicabs with medallions plying in France. The taxicab companies complain that they have more restrictions and that online taxi companies need to face some restrictions in turn. Will a 15 minute imposed delay provide the kind of competition that will help customers ? Are there alternative restrictions, such as caps on surge pricing that may benefit customers and moderate capacity levels across online and street hailed cabs ?

Posted in Operations Management, Service Operations, Supply Chain Issues | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Is web ordering shifting the market share to national chains ?

An article in the Wall Street Journal titled “Big Pizza Chains use web ordering to slice out a bigger market share” (February 6,2014), describes an increase in the market share for large pizza chains to 52% from 47% in 2009, with a corresponding drop for independent stores from 31.5% to 29%. The article suggests that young consumers are drawn to the flexibility of internet ordering and others like the flexibility to take the time to make up their mind by examining alternative menu options on the web. But some independent pizza chains are responding with unique offerings of gourmet or wood fired oven pizzas to stay competitive. Given the rapidly dropping costs for web enabled ordering, will you expect this competitive advantage for large chains to disappear ? Will a differentiated product offering that caters to local tastes result in more variety for customers to choose from and thus a better outcome ?

Posted in Ecommerce, Operations Management, Service Operations | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Amazon’s “Flow” tool and potential impact

An article in the Wall Street Journal titled “Amazon’s Flow Image Recognition beats Barcode Scans” describes an app that enables Amazon’s customers to use their smartphone cameras to identify objects without the need to scan the barcode. This increases the speed of capturing objects e.g., entire carts, rather than individually identifying items by barcode. Does the use of the camera to identify items based on their markings intensify the competition between Amazon and traditional retailers ? How should grocery retailers react to such technology ? How might this technology increase the growth of private label, retailer exclusive products ?

Posted in Ecommerce, Global Contexts, Supply Chain Issues | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Delivery, fashion tips, payment collection and returns by Lamoda’s couriers

An article in Bloombergbusinessweek titled “Where the Deliveryman Gives Fashion Advice” (February 10, 2014), describes the ecommerce website Lamoda in Russia. The internet fashion retailer offers home delivery of fashion that customers can try on and decide within 15 minute whether to purchase or return. Payments can be made to the courier as cash or credit card. The courier is a sales assistant who delivers items the next day and delivers items including 900 brands. The ecommerce company, operating in Russia, solves the problem of the current unreliable Russian postal system and reluctance to hand over payment, while delivering high margin fashion items whose sales are growing rapidly. What is the barrier to entry for competitors to Lamoda and how much of the benefit comes from fashion advice vs logistics convenience ? How important is the exclusivity of brands offered and how should Lamoda enable stores and brands to treat the echannel as profit improving rather than cannibalizing their sales ? Would you see a benefit to offering such options in the US or Europe?

Posted in Ecommerce, Global Contexts, Service Operations, Supply Chain Issues | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Foxconn’s plans for a US manufacturing location

An article in the Wall Street Journal titled “Foxconn Weighs Plan for US Plant” (January 27,2014) describes a statement by Foxconn’s chairman that the company would invest in capital intensive manufacturing in the US. He claims that the company plans to push in the direction of “automation, software and technology innovation” with the US plant being used to generate TV screens larger than 60 inches. Does the rising labor cost in China or a need to create a diversified global production footprint justify this decision ? If growth of the company in new medical products and sustainable products is important, does US manufacturing enable such growth ? Is the US a low cost producer if environmental compliance is a key requirement during production ?

Posted in Global Contexts, Operations Management, Supply Chain Issues | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

“Anticipatory Shipping” ideas from Amazon

An article in the CBS News website (http://www.cbsnews.com/news/amazon-files-patent-for-anticipatory-shipping/) titled “Amazon files patent for anticipatory shipping” provides an outline of the idea. The key is that goods would be shipped out before the customer places the order so that the deliveries are closer to order placement. Data regarding customer searches, purchase history, shopping cart contents etc would be used to initiate shipments before orders. But details of the idea also suggest that while the product is shipped, the delivery address would be specified later, after the item is in transit, to enable lower customer lead times. Given the forecasting models of customer purchase intent, and the goal to speed up shipments, does this new idea merely mimic the goal to move goods to warehouses closer to customer locations ? Should customers be provided some products free if their actual purchase decisions do not match the forecasted intent, with the delivered items being treated as promotions ? Will such moves increase customer loyalty or have other unintended consequences e.g., worries that Amazon has access to a lot more information than the customer intends ? Will such moves enable Amazon to increase its margins because it can provide lower lead times without using premium transportation ?

Posted in Ecommerce, emb2019, imm2018, Operations Management, Service Operations, Supply Chain Issues | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 38 Comments

The many reasons for Christmas delivery delays by UPS

An article in Supply Chain Digest (Jan 6, 2014) available at (http://www.scdigest.com/ontarget/14-01-06-2.php?cid=7717) discusses reasons for the delivery delays of Christmas orders handled by UPS. While UPS anticipated an 8% increase in shipment volume, and added 55,000 employees and 23 aircraft, ecommerce volume surged 63% with many merchants shifting to air shipments due to their own fulfillment delays. The mix of air and ground hurt UPS because of their inherent lead time differences – with UPS having a a smaller fleet size than FedEx. Finally retailer offers to customers to place orders as late as 11 pm on Dec 23 and receive delivery by Christmas is also identified as a reason for delays ad lack of air capacity to complete deliveries by Christmas. What should UPS do to plan for such uncertainties next Christmas ? Should UPS check against available capacity before accepting order so that customers are aware of order delays before they place orders ? Should retailers be offered the option to shift to other delivery providers once UPS’s has reached its capacity ?

Posted in Ecommerce, Operations Management, Service Operations, Supply Chain Issues | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Why are Chinese and Indian yarn manufacturers opening US plants ?

An article in the. Wall Street Journal (December 21,2013) titled “A Good Yarn for US workers” describes decisions by the Chinese yarn manufacturer Kerr to open a plant in North Carolina and the Indian Shrivallabh Pitte group to open a yarn plant in Georgia. These yarn producer decisions are impacted by US “yarn forward” rules that provide breaks for apparel that is made by yarn sourced within countries with duty-free deals with the US. But the Indian producer also benefits from low energy costs in the US, and uninterrupted power supply, along with low borrowing costs and tax breaks. Will the US production costs, which are cheaper than Turkey, Korea and. Brazil, suggest a movement of manufacturing back to the US from China and India for other benefits ? Given the available of cheap uninterrupted power in the US, compared to energy shortages in emerging markets, will that be a driver for a US manufacturing renaissance ? Or is the yarn forward rule making the difference ?

Posted in Global Contexts, Operations Management, Supply Chain Issues | Tagged , , , , , , , | 13 Comments

Centralized vs decentralized last mile delivery models in New York City

An article in the Wall Street. Journal (December 21,2013) titled titled “Delivery goes Hi-Tech” describes Hobsons, a delivery service with its own vans that does 300 trips a day currently, and Postmates, a decentralized service provider that broadcasts request to couriers and picks the best one for delivery. Pricing at Postmates adjusts to congestion and delivery conditions. Each of these services also faces stockouts at designated retail locations which may require them to pick up from alternative locations. Given the pressure for ontime delivery, do you expect one or the other model to dominate ? Will product characteristics dictate which one would be preferred e.g., individual items vs baskets of items ordered ? How will ontime delivery guarantees be expected to differ across the models ?

Posted in Ecommerce, Operations Management, Service Operations, Supply Chain Issues | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment