An article in the Wall Street Journal (September 26,2017) titled “Second-Class Puerto Rico” claims that given the Jones Act (which requires “use of vessels built, majority owned and operated by Americans” to transport between US ports i.e., US to Puerto Rico) the cost to ship from the US East Coast to Puerto Rico is twice that to ship to nearby Dominican Republic. The US administration has refused to waive the Jones Act for hurricane relief, thus adding to the cost of providing aid to assist the island. Should waiving the Jones Act be a priority to offer cost effective relief from the US, or should one expect relief goods to be routed through another non-US location to be cost effective albeit taking longer ? Will the existence of the Jones Act hurt US manufacturers wanting to supply to Puerto Rico and instead provide incentives for manufacturers in other countries ?
Tags
- agriculture
- Amazon
- Apparel
- Apple
- automobiles
- Capability
- Capacity
- China
- Collaboration
- competition
- consumer
- Consumers
- Coordination
- Cost
- Costs
- delivery
- demand
- Demand Surge
- Design
- disruption
- Dual Sourcing
- Ecommerce
- Efficiency
- emb2019
- emb2020
- Environment
- exports
- Fast Fashion
- Food
- Global
- global supply chain
- grocery
- Growth
- healthcare
- hospitals
- imm2018
- Imports
- India
- Infrastructure
- Inventory
- Japan
- Legal
- logistics
- Low Margins
- Loyal Customers
- manufacturing
- Margins
- mgmt5612018
- mgmt5612019
- mgmt5612020
- mgmt5612021
- Outsourcing
- pharmaceutical
- prices
- Quality
- rail
- Rare Earths
- regulation
- Retail
- Retailers
- Risk
- river transport
- Service
- ships
- software
- Suppliers
- Supply Chain
- Survival
- Sustainable
- technology
- transport
- Trends
- US
- WalMart
- Water
-
Recent Posts
Archives
- February 2022
- September 2021
- August 2021
- August 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- June 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- September 2015
- August 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- October 2010
Categories
- Africa
- Air
- airport
- California
- Capacity
- car
- cash
- chicken
- China
- cobalt
- Collaboration
- competitiveness
- congestion
- consumer
- Coordination
- Cost
- delivery
- disruption
- Ecommerce
- emb2019
- emb2020
- emb2021
- fairness
- flash memory
- Global Contexts
- Grain
- hospital
- imm2018
- imm2019
- Innovation
- intellectual property
- IoT
- labeling
- Liability
- logistics
- loyalty
- Made in USA
- manufacturer
- mgmt5612018
- mgmt5612019
- mining
- Operations Management
- ordering
- Prices
- product
- productivity
- queue
- Railroad
- recycling
- retailers
- Service Operations
- ship
- shoes
- Starbucks
- supplier
- Supply Chain Issues
- Sustainability
- technology
- Tesla
- toy
- Train
- transport
- truck
- Uncategorized
- Variety
- vehicles
- waste
Meta
As discussed in previous blogs the purpose of the Jones Act of 1920 was to build a vibrant United States Maritime industry. But 100 years from that time, today is a time when international trade is booming and implementation of Jones Act might actually act as a hindrance to its original purpose. And in times of natural disaster the purpose should be to provide humanitarian relief and not give priority to trade and economy. Hence there should be provisions made in the act for times like Puerto Rico wherein aid could be provided from international communities keeping in mind factors such as cost and time. As of Sep 28th 2017, President Trump has lifted the Jones Act for relief material provisions to Puerto Rico (https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2017/09/28/trump-waives-shipping-restrictions-puerto-rico/711541001/)
The Jones Act was passed during world war -1 to protect US merchant ships which was targeted by German Navy. In course of time this law came towards protecting the rights of US sailors and protecting the US shipping industry from foreign interference and control which also contributes towards national security.
Even though waiver is allowed for Puerto Rico, the damaged road infrastructure inside that country made it very difficult for inland transportation of Oil and other products. Hence even though US shippers sent extra shipments to Puerto Rico, all products were hoarded up at the port waiting to be transported inside the country. Hence waiver was a not of much help in the country of Puerto Rico.