An article in the Wall Street Journal (September 3, 2013) describes a proposal by two companies, eReatah and Oyster, to provide a flat-fee access to ebooks. eReatah plans to offer 80,000 titles and offers a $16.99/month for two books or $33.50 for four books a month. Oyster plans an unlimited access monthly rate. But the list of titles is limited by publishers signing up, with Simon & Schuster, Sourcebooks etc being the early collaborators for eReatah. Will books go the direction of music and movies and thus move to a flat-fee Netflix like model ? Will publishers benefit from this new leased book model as a result of incremental revenues for their digital library ? Which of the two models, Oyster’s or eReatah’s, would you expect to win in the long run, and is there room for both solutions in the market ? How will all of these options play out in the textbook market ?
Tags
- agriculture
- Amazon
- Apparel
- Apple
- automobiles
- Capability
- Capacity
- China
- Collaboration
- competition
- consumer
- Consumers
- Coordination
- Cost
- Costs
- delivery
- demand
- Demand Surge
- Design
- disruption
- Dual Sourcing
- Ecommerce
- Efficiency
- emb2019
- emb2020
- Environment
- exports
- Fast Fashion
- Food
- Global
- global supply chain
- grocery
- Growth
- healthcare
- hospitals
- imm2018
- Imports
- India
- Infrastructure
- Inventory
- Japan
- Legal
- logistics
- Low Margins
- Loyal Customers
- manufacturing
- Margins
- mgmt5612018
- mgmt5612019
- mgmt5612020
- mgmt5612021
- Outsourcing
- pharmaceutical
- prices
- Quality
- rail
- Rare Earths
- regulation
- Retail
- Retailers
- Risk
- river transport
- Service
- ships
- software
- Suppliers
- Supply Chain
- Survival
- Sustainable
- technology
- transport
- Trends
- US
- WalMart
- Water
-
Recent Posts
Archives
- February 2022
- September 2021
- August 2021
- August 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- June 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- September 2015
- August 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- October 2010
Categories
- Africa
- Air
- airport
- California
- Capacity
- car
- cash
- chicken
- China
- cobalt
- Collaboration
- competitiveness
- congestion
- consumer
- Coordination
- Cost
- delivery
- disruption
- Ecommerce
- emb2019
- emb2020
- emb2021
- fairness
- flash memory
- Global Contexts
- Grain
- hospital
- imm2018
- imm2019
- Innovation
- intellectual property
- IoT
- labeling
- Liability
- logistics
- loyalty
- Made in USA
- manufacturer
- mgmt5612018
- mgmt5612019
- mining
- Operations Management
- ordering
- Prices
- product
- productivity
- queue
- Railroad
- recycling
- retailers
- Service Operations
- ship
- shoes
- Starbucks
- supplier
- Supply Chain Issues
- Sustainability
- technology
- Tesla
- toy
- Train
- transport
- truck
- Uncategorized
- Variety
- vehicles
- waste
Meta
While the business models make sense in some ways, there are some reasons to think that this model is not viable to a high profitability business.
1. Netflix is cheaper than cable and some people switch to binge watching which might not always hold true for books. (I’ve tried to binge read books, its tough)
2. The money comes from the tie-ins with the product. Netflix and amazon have other revenue sources than just the subscription rates and thats what makes the streaming industry profitable. I find it hard to imagine that a company can survive only on subscription. If it needs to do just that, the prices have to be sufficiently high and that creates further barriers to getting customer volumes.
3. The audience(or target market) are innovative and ready-to-experiment people. Evidenced by the fact that they switched to ebooks. This means they will shop around for cheaper ways to read and you cannot rely on people who sign up to stick with you for a long time. And there is no way to tie them into the system if you are eReatah or Oyster.
4. Publishers need to be provided a strong incentive to sign up. Getting more publishers to sign up means higher sign-up costs. However, if you can convince the publishers to give you exclusive access to new releases or immensely popular books, then you have a usp that can be sold to the consumer who’s shelling out a premium.
Regardless of my pessimism, I’m still going to sign up and spend a month or two browsing titles and reading books from different platforms. May the best subscription model work(psst: amazon prime).