Should the US government permit recycling of scrap metal from nuclear sites?

An article in the Wall Street Journal (January 17,2013) describes a plan by the US government to release scrap metal from nuclear sites. The scrap is described as containing low enough levels of radioactivity – comparable to exposures in a cross country flight. But worries of use of such recycled material commingled with other metals might hurt US products using them, argue opponents. In addition, use of these metals in glasses, belt buckles or hip joints may cause prolonged exposure to consumers. How should the scrap metal be dealt with and what should be the standard to prevent side effects from being passed on to the public ? Should the scrap be required to be tracked, and if so, will the cost of tracking be so prohibitive as to kill the market ? At which point will the recycling benefit compensate for the downstream risks from release of the scrap material ?

About aviyer2010

This entry was posted in Operations Management, Supply Chain Issues, Sustainability and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Should the US government permit recycling of scrap metal from nuclear sites?

  1. As I discuss in one of my posts, , resourse scarcity has become a top priority for many supply chain practitioners. However, It is hard to believe that scrapping metal from nuclear sites will be the answer to this challenge.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s