The global supply chain for Michael Kors and impact

An article in the New York Times (Dec 20, 2011) describes Michael Kors Holding, an apparel company that generates 95 % of its revenues in the US and Canada, makes its apparel in Asia, and is incorporated in the British Virgin Islands. The result significant tax savings – estimated across all US multinationals to generate $ 1.375 trillion in cash overseas. Should this global supply chain be celebrated as effective management or a deceptive unfair outcome ? Should companies be mandated to pay a sales tax collected on their revenues (by the Federal government) rather than permit incorporation to decide tax consequences – and what would be the associated impact ? Would you expect changes in the income tax collection regime (through restrictions on global supply chains) to increase prices for US consumers ?

Unknown's avatar

About aviyer2010

Dean and H. William Lichtenberger Chair in Management at the School of Management, University at Buffalo, State University of New York.
This entry was posted in Global Contexts, Operations Management, Supply Chain Issues and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a comment