Emissions Rules Relaxation and Industry Impact

A New York Times article (February 23, 2011) describes the current EPA emissions rules – rolling back requirements for industrial boilers, incinerators etc.  The impact is to permit many plants, municipalities, universities etc to reduce their costs of compliance – merely requiring minor adjustments to comply.  This decreases the “cost of Federal regulation” and could thus, potentially, decrease the costs to expand and add jobs.  Is the decreased cost of compliance, and the associated postponement of capital investments to comply, imply more job growth than the alternative stimulus to move to a less polluting industrial operation ? Is this a case where the associated health costs, borne by the government in many cases, lower than the potential immediate benefit to the US supply chain ? Or this is just the US standards descending to those of developing countries in order to compete in global manufacturing ?

About aviyer2010

This entry was posted in Global Contexts, Operations Management, Supply Chain Issues, Sustainability and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Emissions Rules Relaxation and Industry Impact

  1. Dirk Leichsenring says:

    There have been many environmental summits where even the US committed to some rules concerning CO2-emissions. Why can’t the US stick to the lowest levels of their own commitments without giving up efficient supply chains? It isn’t obviously for their own sake because still profit maximization seems to overrule every behaviour with respect to saving the environment. Highly paid managers seek the easy way out…!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s